Executive Summary

The Evidence Bar™: Evidence is inconclusive

 

ivWatch Model 400® is a monitoring device intended to detect infiltration events in patients with peripheral venous catheters (PVCs). ivWatch uses a sensor placed near the IV catheter insertion site and emits visible and near-infrared light through the patient’s skin near the site to detect reflected light. Based on changes in the reflected light, ivWatch produces a visual and audible alarm and displays a color notification on its monitor to indicate possible (yellow) or probable (red) infiltration events that a clinician should evaluate. The device is not intended to replace clinical monitoring but is intended to alert clinicians sooner to infiltration events.

Conclusions: No evidence is available to assess ivWatch's impact on patient outcomes (i.e., clincal utility). One small diagnostic cohort study (i.e., clinical validity) at high risk of bias compared ivWatch to clincally detected infiltration and reported 80% sensitivity (detected 12 of 15 clinician-confirmed infiltration events) in pediatric patients who had continuous PVC infusions. A control group in the study had disabled ivWatch alarms, but infiltration event data were sent to the eletronic health record and subsequently reviewed. The control group data showed that ivWatch sensitivity was 78%; it detected events about 30 hours sooner than clinicians detected them, suggesting ivWatch may enable earlier infiltration detection than routine monitoring alone in most patients. Higher-quality, multicenter studies that report on patient-oriented outcomes, such as adverse events, are needed to assess clinical utility.

  • Clinical validity: One small diagnostic cohort study allocated pediatric patients to a group with ivWatch's alarm enabled (n = 57) and without the alarm enabled (n = 156). In the enabled-alarm group, ivWatch's sensitivity for detecting infiltration events was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.9% to 95.7%). In the disabled-alarm group in which data were sent to the electronic health record and subsequently reviewed, sensitivity was 78.3% (95% CI, 56.5% to 92.5%). In the disabled alarm group, yellow (possible infiltration) and red (probable infiltration) notifications occurred an average of 29.8 (95% CI: 14.8 to 44.8) and 32.3 (95% CI 17.3 to 47.3) hours, respectively, before clinicians detected the same events.

Evidence: Search dates: all literature through September 3, 2019. We identified and reviewed full text of one diagnostic cohort study reporting on 213 patients. ivWatch's original FDA 510(k) premarket notification summary mentions six studies assessing ivWatch's clinical validity but does not provide data for these studies, and our searches indicate they do not appear to be published.

  • One diagnostic cohort study (n = 213) assessed ivWatch's clinical validity for detecting infiltration events in pediatric patients receiving continuous PVC infusions. Clinician-confirmed infiltrations served as the reference standard. The study reported sensitivity only, not specificity or positive and negative predictive values. Patients were allocated to either ivWatch with alarms enabled (n = 57) or with alarms disabled (n = 156) groups. The study also reported the time difference between ivWatch and clinician detection of infiltrations in the disabled-alarm group.
  • Evidence limitations: This study is at risk of patient selection bias because of small sample size and at high risk of bias due to single-center focus. Also, clinical staff were not blinded to the ivWatch intervention or patient's other clinical information. Authors did not report whether they enrolled consecutive patients or a random sample, and participation relied on parental permission. The study did not report on ivWatch's specificity or on patient-oriented outcomes. Most catheter sites were positioned in patient's hands and forearms, and findings may not generalize to foot or leg infiltrations.

Safety: No FDA MAUDE reports identified.

Ongoing trials: None identified.

Who Should Read This

Table of Contents

Product Overview

ivWatch 400 (ivWatch LLC, Hampton, VA, USA) is intended to detect infiltration events in patients with peripherally inserted IVs and produce auditory and visual alarms to notify clinicians and notify them sooner than clinician observation can detect. IV infusion pumps, which clinicians must routinely monitor, are not equipped with alarms for infiltrations (for more information, see ECRI Guidance for Infiltration during Infusion Therapy: Why It Occurs and How to Prevent It). ivWatch uses a sensor placed near the inserted IV and emits visible and near-infrared light through a patient's skin to detect reflected light. ivWatch detects changes in reflection due to accumulation of subcutaneous fluid that is detected as an infiltration event. (See the manufacturer's website for more information.) The amount of light the sensor detects depends on the tissue's scattering and absorptive properties. When infiltration occurs, the optical scattering properties purportedly decrease because of fluid in the subcutaneous tissue. Yellow or red notifications are displayed on the monitor; yellow notifications indicate possible infiltration, and red notifications indicate probable infiltration. A notification's intent is to prompt clinical assessment of the IV site and catheter function to ensure proper sensor placement; that the IV line flushes without resistance, swelling, or pain; and to assess whether redness or leakage is present.

ivWatch consists of a display monitor, a reusable sensor cable, and a disposable sensor receptacle. A clinician first plugs the sensor cable into the monitor and follows a series of on-screen commands to begin monitoring. The clinician attaches a sterile sensor receptacle to the sensor cable and positions the receptacle on the patient, within one inch of the inserted catheter tip. The clinician covers the catheter with occlusive dressing, according to facility protocols, without covering the sensor receptacle. The monitor displays a yellow or red screen that states “Check IV" when a possible or probable infiltration is detected, respectively. The clinician uses the monitor controls to confirm that the IV has been checked and to review monitoring history. (For additional information see the ivWatch user manual.)

Purported Benefits/Advantages According to Manufacturer Information*

  • “Continuous IV monitoring alerts caregivers if conditions indicate an infiltration has occurred, minimizing the risks of IV therapy."
  • “Ensures that time-sensitive, life-saving drugs or fluids are being delivered through the vein as intended and helps reduce medication dosing errors."
  • “Device offers high sensitivity in very low volumes (as little as 0.22 mL), plus a visual/auditory alert system to help detect infiltrations."
  • “Facilities using Philips Patient Monitoring Systems will see early infiltration detection notifications on in-room and remote nurse station monitors allowing clinicians to respond quickly to events and minimize patient harm."
  • “Provides real-time infiltration status of patients' IV site and documents bedside nurse assessments."
  • “Infiltration/extravasation data can be integrated into the EMR, reducing staff time associated with documentation."
  • “Increases nursing satisfaction through high device reliability and low false alarm frequency"
  • “Aids in accurate information exchange during shift changes as visual notification helps staff quickly recognize a previous red Check IV notification."
  • “One-click assessments improve overall workflow, saving clinicians' time throughout every shift."

*Note: This is a list of the main benefits described by the manufacturer and does not imply endorsement or validation by ECRI Institute.


Regulatory Status

FDA granted 510(k) marketing clearance for ivWatch 400 for patients 18 years of age or older in February 2015 (K142374). FDA granted the ivWatch Model 400 an updated clearance to include pediatric patients) in December 2016 (K162478). The labeled indications are as follows:

The ivWatch Model 400 is indicated for the detection of subcutaneous infiltrations and extravasations of 10 cc or less of optically clear infusates, as an adjunctive device to the clinical evaluation in the healthcare setting of adults and pediatrics with peripherally-inserted catheters (PIVs). The device is indicated to assess patients for subcutaneous infiltrations and extravasations but should not serve as a substitute for regular clinician assessment of the PIV site. The ivWatch Model 400 is intended for use by healthcare practitioners who have been trained in the use of the device.

Clinical Literature

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and selected web-based resources for all available literature published through September 3, 2019. Our search strategies included the following keyword: IvWatch. Please see the Selected Resources and References section for detailed search strategies. We identified and reviewed full text of 1 diagnostic cohort study (n = 213) that assessed ivWatch's clinical validity for detecting infiltration events in pediatric patients receiving continuous PVC infusions. Clinician-confirmed infiltrations served as the reference standard; however, the study reported only on sensitivity (not specificity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value).

The study allocated patients to 2 groups: those with ivWatch alarms enabled (n = 57) and those with alarms disabled (n = 156). Authors also reported the time difference between ivWatch and clinician detection of infiltrations in the disabled-alarm group.(1) See Table 1 for a study summary.

We identified no studies assessing ivWatch's clinical utility. ivWatch's original FDA 510(k) premarket notification summary (K142374) mentions six Institutional Review Board–approved ivWatch studies but does not provide data for these studies; our searches identified no publications for these studies.

Evidence Limitations

The sole study is at risk of patient selection bias because of small sample size and at high risk of bias due to single-center focus and lack of blinding to the patient's other clinical information. Authors do not report whether they enrolled consecutive patients or a random sample of patients. The study did not report on ivWatch's specificity or on patient-oriented outcomes. Most catheters were positioned in patient's hands and forearms, and findings may not generalize to foot or leg infiltrations.

Ongoing Trials

Our search of ClinicalTrials.gov did not identify any ongoing clinical trials assessing ivWatch.

Safety

We searched ECRI Institute's Health Devices Alerts database and FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for product-specific alerts or recalls and adverse events. We identified no relevant information.

Table 1. Product-specific Clinical Literature
Author/Year Study Type and Patients Treatment(s) Results as Reported by Authors Authors' Conclusions

Doellman and Rineair 2019(1)

 

Reviewed full text (available with subscription)

 

United States

 

Manufacturer-funded

Diagnostic cohort study (n = 213) of pediatric patients (neonates to 17 years) receiving continuous infusions through peripheral catheters

ivWatch with audio and video alarms (n = 57)

 

ivWatch with  alarms disabled (n = 156)

 

Bedside nurses monitored catheter sites of both groups, hourly, for infiltrations.

“A total of 15 clinician-confirmed infiltrations occurred in 57 patients with an infiltration rate of 26.3%. The device issued a yellow and red notification in 12 of the 15 clinician-confirmed infiltrations for the study group. This corresponds to a sensitivity of 80%, and a 95% confidence interval from 51.9% to 95.7% using the Clopper-Pearson method."

“A total of 23 clinician-confirmed infiltrations occurred in 156 patients, which corresponds to an infiltration rate of 14.7% for the control group. The device would have alarmed for 18 out of 23 infiltrations."

“On average, the device issued a red notification 29.8 hours prior to a clinician detecting it, with a 95% confidence interval of 14.8 to 44.8 hours using Student's t-distribution. A yellow notification was issued an average of 32.3 hours prior to clinician detection, with a 95% confidence interval of 17.3 to 47.3 hours."

“Over the course of the study, the device demonstrated 80% sensitivity in detecting infiltration events and issuing notifications for an infiltration before the clinician detects it. In addition to hourly IV site assessments by the bedside clinician, pediatric patients receiving a continuous infusion may benefit by this type of novel technology."

Glossary

Bibliography

References

References Reviewed (PubMed and EMBASE search dates were all literature through September 3, 2019)

  1. Doellman, D, and Rineair, S. The use of optical detection for continuous monitoring of pediatric IV sites. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access. 2019;24(2):44-47. Full text

Resource List

Related Resources

PubMed Search Strategy

  • #1 - iv-watch* OR ivwatch* OR (smarttouch* AND watch*)
  • #2 - (intravenous* OR IV OR PIV) AND (extravasation* OR infiltrat* OR infusate* OR leak*) AND (infrared OR light OR notification* OR optic*)
  • #3 - NCT04065373 OR NCT04064229 OR NCT02120443 OR NCT02123745 OR NCT02553421 OR NCT01800552 OR NCT01800552 OR NCT01476293
  • #4 - #1 OR #2 OR #3

EMBASE Search Strategy

  • #1 - 'iv-watch*' OR ivwatch* OR (smarttouch* AND watch*)
  • #2 - (intravenous* OR IV OR PIV) AND (extravasation* OR infiltrat* OR infusate* OR leak*) AND (infrared OR light OR notification* OR optic*)
  • #3 - NCT04065373 OR NCT04064229 OR NCT02120443 OR NCT02123745 OR NCT02553421 OR NCT01800552 OR NCT01800552 OR NCT01476293
  • #4 - #1 OR #2 OR #3

ECRI Institute Resources. Available from: https://www.ecri.org.

FDA website. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available from: http://www.fda.gov.

We identified three clearances for the ivWatch. We did not identify any Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) records.

Manufacturer Website (ivWatch, LLC, Hampton, VA, USA)

Product Information
Studies and Press Releases

ClinicalTrials.gov. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health. Available from: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

We identified registered clinical trials on this device. See the comprehensive list of ongoing, completed, and terminated trials. Note that at the time of the search we did not identify any ongoing trials.

Additional Resources

Topics and Metadata

Topics

Infusion Therapy; Technology Selection

Caresetting

Hospital Inpatient; Hospital Outpatient; Ambulatory Care Center; Ambulatory Surgery Center; Dialysis Facility; Emergency Department; Hospice; Independent Living Facility; Rehabilitation Facility; Short-stay Facility; Skilled-nursing Facility; Trauma Center

Clinical Specialty

Nursing; Anesthesiology

Roles

Clinical Practitioner; Biomedical/Clinical Engineer; Nurse

Information Type

Guidance

Phase of Diffusion

 

Technology Class

Device

Clinical Category

Physiologic Monitoring

SourceBase Supplier

Product Catalog

MeSH

ICD9/ICD10

FDA SPN

SNOMED

HCPCS

Disease/Condition

 

Publication History